Welcome to my website, where you'll feel right at home. I'm Sherif, and I've created this space just for you. Let's explore together!
Overestimation of fibrinogen concentration in cryoprecipitate by repeated freeze–thawing with long thawing period as used in the Clauss method
Overestimation of fibrinogen concentration in cryoprecipitate by repeated freeze–thawing with long thawing period as used in the Clauss method

Overestimation of fibrinogen concentration in cryoprecipitate by repeated freeze–thawing with long thawing period as used in the Clauss method

Overestimation of fibrinogen concentration in cryoprecipitate by repeated freeze–thawing with long thawing period as used in the Clauss method

This summary was assisted by AI :
 

🎓 Citation Information:

  • Author(s): Yumi Tanaka, Takeshi Matsumoto, Kanae Kadoya, Yuji Shimokaria, Isao Tawara, Naoyuki Katayama, Kohshi Ohishi
  • Title: Overestimation of fibrinogen concentration in cryoprecipitate by repeated freeze–thawing with long thawing period as used in the Clauss method
  • Journal/Source: Transfusion, 2023;63(8):1435-1440
  • Publication Year: 2023
  • Pages: 1435-1440
  • DOI/URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17483 ↗
  • Affiliation: Department of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan

🌌 Contextual Insight:

  • In a Sentence: The study examines the risk of fibrinogen concentration overestimation in cryoprecipitate prepared by repeated freeze-thawing using the Clauss method.
  • Keywords: Cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen, Clauss method, freeze-thawing, hypercoagulability
  • Gap/Need: No established optimal cryoprecipitate preparation method from fresh frozen plasma. Need to examine fibrinogen measurement accuracy.
  • Novelty: Finds repeated freeze-thawing induces hypercoagulable stateleading to fibrinogen overestimation by Clauss method. Proposes alternative estimation.
  • Target Audience: Transfusion medicine professionals, hematologists.
  • Jargon Density: Some technical terms but overall easy to understand.
  • Recommendation: Recommended for novice to intermediate readers in transfusion medicine or hematology.

🧭 Purpose/Objective:

  • Goal: Determine risk of fibrinogen overestimation in cryoprecipitate prepared by repeated freeze-thawing.
  • Research Questions: What is the impact of freeze-thaw cycles and thawing period on cryoprecipitate properties? Does repeated freeze-thawing induce a hypercoagulable state?
  • Significance: Ensure accurate fibrinogen measurement for quality control of cryoprecipitate, an important hemostatic agent.

🎓 Background Knowledge:

  • Core Concepts: Cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen, Clauss method, fresh frozen plasma, hypercoagulability
  • Preliminary Theories: Repeated freeze-thawing may impact clotting factor activity levels and properties of cryoprecipitate.
  • Contextual Timeline: Discovery of cryoprecipitate in 1960s, development as haemophilia treatment, now used for hypofibrinogenemia. No standardized production method.
  • Prior Research: Studies on effects of freeze-thaw cycles on factor levels but not on fibrinogen measurement accuracy.
  • Terminology: Cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen, Clauss method, fresh frozen plasma, soluble fibrin monomer complex, thrombin-antithrombin complex

📝 Methodology:

  • Research Design & Rationale: Comparative study of cryoprecipitate prepared under different conditions to analyze properties and risk of fibrinogen overestimation. Sound rationale.
  • Participants/Subjects: Fresh frozen plasma samples – no human subjects
  • Instruments/Tools: Clauss method, assays for soluble fibrin monomer complex and thrombin-antithrombin complex
  • Data Collection: Description of cryoprecipitate preparation conditions and assays used.
  • Data Analysis Techniques: Calculation of purification/recovery rates. Comparison of direct vs indirect fibrinogen measurement.
  • Ethical Considerations: No human subjects
  • Comparison to Standard: Adheres to standard practices
  • Replicability Score: 8/10 – methods clearly described but performance may vary between labs

📊 Main Results/Findings:

  • Purification/recovery higher with repeated freeze-thawing but risk of overestimation
  • Direct fibrinogen measurement higher than indirect, especially with long thaw/repeated cycles
  • Elevated soluble fibrin monomer complex with long thaw/repeated cycles indicates hypercoagulable state
  • Data and code not provided
  • Statistical significance reported where applicable

🔄 Discussion & Interpretation:

  • Hypercoagulable state from repeated freeze-thawing leads to overestimation by Clauss method
  • Longer thaw period may further induce hypercoagulable state
  • Alternative indirect fibrinogen estimation method proposed
  • Findings align with previous literature on factor changes post freeze-thaw

❌ Limitations:

  • Performance may vary between laboratories
  • Further studies needed to understand hypercoagulable state induction mechanism

🖋️ Conclusions:

  • Repeated freeze-thawing, especially with long thaw, risks fibrinogen overestimation
  • Hypercoagulable cryoprecipitate state is the cause
  • Indirect estimation is a better quality control approach

🚀 Future Work:

  • Determine optimal preparation method balancing recovery and accuracy
  • Elucidate mechanism of hypercoagulable state induction

📚 References: Several highly relevant past studies on cryoprecipitate and factor activity post freeze-thaw cited.

🎯 Relevance:

Provides valuable quality control insights for transfusion laboratories producing cryoprecipitate, an important hemostatic product. Understanding measurement accuracy is clinically impactful.

🌐 Textual Mind Map:

Main branches:

  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion

Sub-branches:

  • Introduction: Problem statement, objectives, background
  • Methods: Study design, participants, instruments, procedures
  • Results: Purification rates, fibrinogen measurements, hypercoagulable markers
  • Discussion: Mechanism of overestimation, limitations, future directions

Connections: Findings on hypercoagulable state link background to results and inform discussion. Alternative estimation method connects discussion to conclusions.

Key facts: Purification/recovery rates, direct vs indirect fibrinogen amounts, soluble fibrin levels

Key arguments: Repeated freeze-thaw induces a hypercoagulable state leading to overestimation risk by Clauss method. Indirect estimation is a better quality control approach.

🌟 Key Quotes:

“Direct fibrinogen measurement of CRY presents a higher risk of overestimation, particularly in the case of CRY prepared by repeated freeze-thawing with a longer thawing period.”

🧠 Personal Insights/Comments:

  • Findings have practical implications for transfusion practice policy and quality control
  • Study could be improved by releasing data/code to enable full reproducibility
  • Additional investigations into the physiological effects of induced hypercoagulability warranted
 
 
 
 
Share it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *